A BLOG DEDICATED TO MY LOVE OF THE SILVER SCREEN
Established May 2010.


Gordie: Do you think I'm weird?
Chris: Definitely.
Gordie: No man, seriously. Am I weird?
Chris: Yeah, but so what? Everybody's weird.
-STAND BY ME

Film Critic for Twin Cities Live

Member of THE LAMB: The Large Association of Movie Blogs LAMB #1588

Follow me on Twitter for updates to my blog and other fun movie news. Find me at @PaulsMovieTrip

Find and "like" me on Facebook at Paul's Trip to the Movies


Showing posts with label Rachel McAdams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rachel McAdams. Show all posts

Saturday, August 2, 2014

TWIN CITIES LIVE- August 1, 2014

TWIN CITIES LIVE
August 1, 2014













1. GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, starring Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, Bradley Cooper, Vin Diesel
2. A MOST WANTED MAN, starring Philip Seymour Hoffman, Rachel McAdams, Willem Dafoe, Robin Wright
3. THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL, starring Ralph Fiennes, Tilda Swinton, Jeff Goldblum

Here's the video:




Video courtesy of Twin Cities Live/KSTP

You can find all of my past segments HERE.

As always, thank you so much for watching and your continual support. I truly appreciate it!
Pin It Now!

Thursday, May 8, 2014

TWIN CITIES LIVE--May 7, 2014

TWIN CITIES LIVE
May 7, 2014












We chatted about two different movies on Twin Cities Live today, one big blockbuster and a sweet rom-com that you can enjoy at home!

Today's movies are:

1. The Amazing Spider-Man 2., starring Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Sally Field, and Jamie Foxx
3. About Time, starring Domhnall Gleeson, Rachel McAdams, and Bill Nighy




Video courtesy of Twin Cities Live/KSTP


As always, thank you so much for watching!
Pin It Now!

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Movie Review: ABOUT TIME

ABOUT TIME
Director: Richard Curtis
Starring: Domhnall Gleeson, Rachel McAdams, Bill Nighy, Lydia Wilson, Lindsay Duncan, Tom Hollander, Richard Griffiths


It is safe to say that both Richard Curtis and Rachel McAdams are known for the rom-coms. He has written Love Actually, Notting Hill, and Four Weddings and a Funeral. She has made audiences weep in The Notebook, The Vow, and The Time Traveler's Wife. Why has it taken this long for the two of them to work together? On his 21st birthday, Tim (Gleeson) learns an old family secret from his dad (Nighy) that the men in the family have the ability to travel back in time. They can only travel back to some point in their own lifetime. There is no going back to the medieval times nor can they go party with the Beatles. Tim is highly skeptical until he goes into his wardrobe, clenches his fists, and finds himself back at the New Year’s Eve party where he musters the courage to actually kiss the girl at midnight.


Tim is a bit dorky and realizes he can’t just travel back in time to make any random girl fall in love with him. If the girl seems interested in him to begin with, that is another story. While in London working as a lawyer he meets Mary (McAdams) one night in a “dark” themed restaurant. There seems to be a mutual connection between the two of them but she has to leave before they can really spend the night together. Tim’s playwright roommate (Hollander) informs him of the wretched opening night of his newest play that will inevitable ruin his career. Tim goes back in time to make sure the play goes off without a hitch. Unfortunately, that changes the events leading up to how he met Mary. He learns the hard way after showing up at a photography exhibit where she has no idea who he is. As you can tell by the trailer, he takes a few different trips back in time to learn more about her to place him at just the right moment where she will be enamored by him and they can live happily ever after. That’s not really a huge spoiler as Tim learns when and how he will use this power to “rumble, stumble, and tumble” his way through time, love, and life.


When you have a film about time travel, you have to just suspend your belief in reality for a bit and just go with it. If you can’t do that, there is no way to enjoy a story like this. Rachel McAdams must love the whimsical feel films like these have as this is her third movie involving time travel after The Time Traveler’s Wife and Midnight in Paris, yet she never gets to do any of the time traveling herself. Curtis uses this special ability as a story enhancer but does not make the film all about time travel. No one is going back to win the lottery, kill Hitler, or prevent a crime. The film is more about the love stories between Tim and Mary and Tim and his dad and how he can make the most out of his time with both of them. He learns early on that there are consequences and that this ability comes with a price. There is a simple everyday romance between Tim and Mary without some tragedy that gets in their own. Yes, there are obstacles and roadblocks but it doesn’t have that unrealistic feeling that can come with something like a Nicholas Sparks story.


McAdams and Gleeson have a really sweet, infectiously charming chemistry to them. She has been partnered up with at least five leading men now in romantic stories, but there can be something missing in the chemistry. I’m thinking of Eric Bana and Owen Wilson in particular. Both their characters of Tim and Mary fit so well together that you can buy into their relationship even if the time travel throws you off. It is not just about two gorgeous people falling in love with each other. There is a dorkable and normal quality that each of them have. What is not to love about Bill Nighy?!? He is another one of those British actors where I love everything about them. The father/son relationship is so strong and integral to this movie, and it may even appeal to you more than say the Tim and Mary relationship. He always carries with him these sweet, charming, funny, and kind qualities which in this case anchors and elevates this story to something more than just your average rom-com. In his last screen appearance, wonderful character Richard Griffiths has a brief cameo playing an actor in the play written by Hollander's character. You may also remember that Gleeson, Nighy, and Griffiths all have appearances in the Harry Potter series!


Curtis has yet again gathered another endearing cast who is fully equipped to bring out the charm, wit, and quirks in his script. He is also known for his distinct choice of music used throughout. Like Love Actually, there are particular songs that define certain scenes featuring the likes of Ben Folds and Jimmy Fontana to name a few. On these chilly fall nights, sometimes a feel good romance can be just what you need to feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

RATING: **** (4 out of 5 stars)

Pin It Now!

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Movie Review: TO THE WONDER

TO THE WONDER
Director: Terrence Malick
Starring: Ben Affleck, Olga Kurylenko, Javier Bardem, Rachel McAdams



Director Terrence Malick is known to be a reclusive, artistic, mysterious type of director. Over a span of his forty year career he has made six movies clearly taking time in between each artistic endeavor. It comes as somewhat of a surprise that his latest, To the Wonder, has been released just two years after his Oscar nominated The Tree of Life. This internal look into life, love, and happiness feels very much like a companion piece to The Tree of Life in tone, style, mystery, and artistry.



Unlike some of his other films, the story is entirely set in modern day. Neil (Affleck) and Marina (Kurylenko) fall desperately for each other against the backdrop of the Mont St. Michel in France. Marina and her daughter, Tatiana, give up their home in France to live with Neil in Oklahoma. She starts to settle in as he works doing environmental research in the community. Their mainly empty home is set in the heart of a new development with wealthy neighbors and their beautiful houses.



Despite the new life, Marina has troubles adjusting to the vastly different life she now has in Oklahoma compared to the one in France. She spends her spare time in her local church reflecting and contemplating her options. Father Quintana (Bardem) is struggling with his own vocation all the while putting on the standard content face he must share with his congregation. He spends the majority of his days helping the poor and sick members of the community often times putting his own life in jeopardy. Marina's visa expires and she moves back to France with Tatiana. Meanwhile, Neil reconnects with formal flame, Jane (McAdams). Marina cannot seem to ever stay in a happy place as she realizes back in France that she misses Neil too much and moves back to Oklahoma.



Much like his last film, Malick uses poetic narration, imagery, and a simple musical score to tell his story. There is very little actual dialogue between the characters. The narration goes back and forth between the three main characters in a poetic style feeling like they are writing each other letters. The camera never stops moving as the actors are set out to interact with each other and the space while maintaining this story through the sparse dialogue. Much to Malick’s direction and the strong work done by Bardem, Affleck, and Kurylenko they all have created a world you can easily understand. You theoretically could turn off the score and narration and still understand the through line of the story.



Malick’s films are not the most accessible to watch. They require an open mind and patience when sitting through two hours of a slow story with limited dialogue and action as you watch three characters internally struggle with their happiness and purpose in life. I was continually in awe of the beautiful nature shots captured by cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, who also shot The Tree of Life. Both films feel very personal and autobiographical for him. This film will by no means convert anyone into a Malick fan as these characters are continually depressed with their lives and are seen walking around town dealing with the poor, twirling around in a field, or getting into fights. The audience does not even get to hear any of the potentially good and juicy dialogue that usual comes with these fights. You just watch the two actors struggle. Having watched a few Malick movies before, I knew what I was getting into. I was able to ease in and enjoy the film for what it was. Will you? Only if you are a Malick fan. What does that say about a director that has a distinct point of view, is artistic, and personal in his work but can only cater to a small sect of fans? Does that make him all the more genius or does it turn into someone being self-indulgent and pretentious?

RATING: *** 1/2 (3.5 out of 5 stars)

Pin It Now!